Frist: Judicial filibusters must stop
Senate majority leader may press again for rules changes
Story Here
Frist said filibustering judicial nominees is "radical. It is dangerous and it must be overcome. The Senate must be allowed to confirm judges who fairly, justly and independently interpret the law."
-----
Hey, I have an idea. Why don't you nominate someone who will do just that and then you will easily get the 60 votes required. But no...its much more ideologically sound to change the rules so you can push through someone who interprets the law fairly and justly within the boundaries of your ideology.
Where was the push for rule change when Clinton's nominees were being blocked?
Senate majority leader may press again for rules changes
Story Here
Frist said filibustering judicial nominees is "radical. It is dangerous and it must be overcome. The Senate must be allowed to confirm judges who fairly, justly and independently interpret the law."
-----
Hey, I have an idea. Why don't you nominate someone who will do just that and then you will easily get the 60 votes required. But no...its much more ideologically sound to change the rules so you can push through someone who interprets the law fairly and justly within the boundaries of your ideology.
Where was the push for rule change when Clinton's nominees were being blocked?
posted by Mike at 10:33 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home