A Response To: "Junk Science - Global Warming: The Movie"
Read This First -------> Editorial Link
Where to start? Actually, it would be harder to end a response to this absolute garbage, but I will try to keep it short as such baseless garbage is hardly worth the time it takes to respond. The fact that you state categorically that your essays "prove" their is no evidence supporting the hypothesis that we are affecting the environment is ludicrous on its face. Virtually EVERY reputable scientific community agrees that we are indeed affecting the climate, not to mention general health of the humans who inhabit this planet, with our industrial, vehicle and other emissions. Because they cannot pinpoint the extent or cannot produce a confidence level that satisfies ideological dogmatist like yourself does not mean there isn't significant evidence that we are indeed creating change in the global climate. To state otherwise is to be disingenuous to your readers and hardly falls into the category of "fair and balanced".
Furthermore, your supposition that their agenda, implying all green organizations, is to control the world's energy resources is nothing more than personal paranoia used to scare your target demographic without providing any kind of empirical evidence to support your position. There is a word for this, it's propaganda. What is it with the people who write editorials for FOX? Seriously, it is almost always and all or nothing, black or white, position. You spew propaganda that adds nothing to the rational debates about the issue on which you write. Are there ideologues in the "Green" camp, for sure. But, to hold them up as the mainstream and to readily dismiss the real concerns about the environment is simply irresponsible for someone of your education level. I'm beginning to see why someone with your education spends time writing propaganda, what you call essays or editorials, instead of engaging in scientific research.
Read This First -------> Editorial Link
Where to start? Actually, it would be harder to end a response to this absolute garbage, but I will try to keep it short as such baseless garbage is hardly worth the time it takes to respond. The fact that you state categorically that your essays "prove" their is no evidence supporting the hypothesis that we are affecting the environment is ludicrous on its face. Virtually EVERY reputable scientific community agrees that we are indeed affecting the climate, not to mention general health of the humans who inhabit this planet, with our industrial, vehicle and other emissions. Because they cannot pinpoint the extent or cannot produce a confidence level that satisfies ideological dogmatist like yourself does not mean there isn't significant evidence that we are indeed creating change in the global climate. To state otherwise is to be disingenuous to your readers and hardly falls into the category of "fair and balanced".
Furthermore, your supposition that their agenda, implying all green organizations, is to control the world's energy resources is nothing more than personal paranoia used to scare your target demographic without providing any kind of empirical evidence to support your position. There is a word for this, it's propaganda. What is it with the people who write editorials for FOX? Seriously, it is almost always and all or nothing, black or white, position. You spew propaganda that adds nothing to the rational debates about the issue on which you write. Are there ideologues in the "Green" camp, for sure. But, to hold them up as the mainstream and to readily dismiss the real concerns about the environment is simply irresponsible for someone of your education level. I'm beginning to see why someone with your education spends time writing propaganda, what you call essays or editorials, instead of engaging in scientific research.
posted by Mike at 8:56 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home